search

Gabriel Decamps vs Tibo Colson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Decamps vs Colson analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Gabriel Decamps vs Tibo Colson Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Decamps 1 - 0 Colson

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Decamps has won 48.76% of points on their second serve, while Colson has won 47.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Decamps, in recent form, has won 56.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Colson has won 45.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.23% and 27.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Decamps has saved 55.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Colson has saved 62.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Decamps has won 62.71% of matches played (W/L 37/ 22), with Colson winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12). Colson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 47/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 35/ 35).
  • Player level: In the last year, Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.09% of matches (W/L 32/ 15), where as Colson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.85% of matches (W/L 27/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Decamps winning 1 times and Colson being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Decamps winning 2 and Colson winning 0. The last match between Decamps and Colson was at the M25 Vilnius, 18-01-2022, First, I.hard with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Decamps and Colson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Decamps winning 0 times and Colson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Decamps winning 0, and Colson 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Decamps has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.8 while Colson has played against players with an average rank of 219.69.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Decamps has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Colson has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Decamps has converted 46.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Colson has converted 38.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Gabriel Decamps

2

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

622

Rank

262

High

24

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

450

Rank

395

High

23

Age

Plays

Tibo Colson

3

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L W L W L W W L L

Form

L L W L W W W L L L

63% (164-96)

Career Total W/L

59% (106-75)

66% (21-11)

YTD W/L

41% (9-13)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

1

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Gabriel Decamps vs Tibo Colson For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Decamps VS Colson

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Decamps VS Colson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Gabriel Decamps Tibo Colson
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 7
Aces (Total) 1 5
DFs Total 2 2
Avg Match Time 1:9:0 1:9:0
1st Serve % 67% (34/51) 58% (34/59)
1st Serve Win% 76% (26/34) 74% (25/34)
2nd Serve Win% 59% (10/17) 36% (9/25)
BPs Won% (Total) 57% (4/7) 17% (1/6)
Return Points W% 42% (25/59) 29% (15/51)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Decamps VS Colson H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-4
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Tibo Colson
67% ( 34 of 51)
1st Serve %
58% ( 34 of 59)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 25 of 34)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
29% ( 15 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 25 of 59)
61
Total Points Won
49

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Gabriel Decamps Tibo Colson
YTD W/L 66% (21/11) 41% (9/13)
Sets Win/Loss 65% (45/24) 44% (22/28)
Games Win/Loss 57% (356/271) 47% (236/265)
Hard Win/Loss 74% (14/5) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 55% (6/5) 40% (4/6)
Indoor Hard W/L 50% (1/1) 42% (5/7)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.21 0.85
Aces Total 65 208
DFs per game 0.35 0.38
DFs Total 105 93
Avg Match Time 1:29:28 1:33:38
Avg Opp Rank 162.5 226.82
1st Serve % 61% (1092/1777) 60% (952/1593)
1st Serve W% 68% (746/1092) 73% (697/952)
2nd Serve W% 49% (334/685) 48% (306/641)
BPs Won% Total 47% (107/228) 39% (41/106)
Return Pts W% 44% (842/1897) 34% (533/1548)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 50% (2/2) 22% (2/7)
Futures W/L 68% (19/9) 54% (7/6)
Best of 3 Sets W% 69% (20/29) 43% (9/21)
Best of 5 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 71% (5/7) 58% (7/12)
Deciding Set W% 50% (3/6) 43% (3/7)
1st set W, W 100% (18/18) 89% (9/8)
1st set W, L 0% (18/0) 11% (9/1)
1st set L, W 21% (14/3) 8% (13/1)

Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Filip Pieczonka
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50% ( 2 of 4)
1st Serve %
23% ( 3 of 13)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
100% ( 2 of 2)
1st Serve Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
100% ( 2 of 2)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
0% ( 0 of 4)
Rtn Points Won
69% ( 9 of 13)
13
Total Points Won
4
L
3-0 ret. H2H
QF
cross
Mili Poljicak
Player
Gabriel Decamps
54% ( 38 of 70)
1st Serve %
61% ( 39 of 64)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 24 of 39)
50% ( 16 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
37% ( 26 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 29 of 64)
73
Total Points Won
61
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Jonas Trinker
57% ( 24 of 42)
1st Serve %
60% ( 27 of 45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
96% ( 23 of 24)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
33% ( 6 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
31% ( 13 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
57
Total Points Won
30
W
6-1 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Marino Jakic
56% ( 48 of 85)
1st Serve %
61% ( 43 of 71)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69% ( 33 of 48)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 26 of 43)
57% ( 21 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
36% ( 31 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 71)
87
Total Points Won
69
W
6-2 3-6 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Karue Sell
Player
Gabriel Decamps
52% ( 53 of 102)
1st Serve %
63% ( 51 of 81)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68% ( 36 of 53)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 30 of 51)
47% ( 23 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 14 of 30)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
42% ( 43 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 37 of 81)
96
Total Points Won
87
L
6-1 2-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48% ( 23 of 48)
1st Serve %
55% ( 32 of 58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74% ( 17 of 23)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 15 of 32)
48% ( 12 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 8 of 26)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
40% ( 19 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 35 of 58)
64
Total Points Won
42
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66% ( 48 of 73)
1st Serve %
77% ( 47 of 61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60% ( 29 of 48)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 21 of 47)
44% ( 11 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
45% ( 33 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 35 of 61)
75
Total Points Won
59
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
70% ( 39 of 56)
1st Serve %
45% ( 21 of 47)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72% ( 28 of 39)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 12 of 21)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
32% ( 18 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 23 of 47)
61
Total Points Won
42
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50% ( 30 of 60)
1st Serve %
69% ( 34 of 49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73% ( 22 of 30)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 14 of 34)
47% ( 14 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 7 of 15)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
40% ( 24 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 28 of 49)
64
Total Points Won
45
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57% ( 20 of 35)
1st Serve %
62% ( 36 of 58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75% ( 15 of 20)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 20 of 36)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
14% ( 3 of 22)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 10 of 35)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 35 of 58)
60
Total Points Won
33
W
6-2 6-1 H2H

Tibo Colson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Timo Legout
Player
Tibo Colson
58% ( 36 of 62)
1st Serve %
54% ( 30 of 56)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75% ( 27 of 36)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 22 of 30)
65% ( 17 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 5)
29% ( 18 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 23 of 56)
67
Total Points Won
51
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
John Sperle
Player
Tibo Colson
73% ( 58 of 80)
1st Serve %
64% ( 48 of 75)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
64% ( 37 of 58)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 34 of 48)
77% ( 17 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 13 of 27)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
33% ( 26 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 28 of 75)
82
Total Points Won
73
L
6-2 4-6 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Tibo Colson
73% ( 69 of 94)
1st Serve %
61% ( 55 of 90)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
65% ( 45 of 69)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 40 of 55)
72% ( 18 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 15 of 35)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
33% ( 31 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 35 of 90)
98
Total Points Won
86
L
6-4 5-7 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Tibo Colson
Player
Edas Butvilas
56% ( 59 of 106)
1st Serve %
59% ( 61 of 103)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71% ( 42 of 59)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 41 of 61)
43% ( 20 of 47)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
56% ( 5 of 9)
42% ( 44 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 40 of 103)
102
Total Points Won
107
W
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) H2H
R2
cross
Tibo Colson
Player
Reda Bennani
67% ( 44 of 66)
1st Serve %
74% ( 39 of 53)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
73% ( 32 of 44)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 20 of 39)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
71% ( 10 of 14)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
33% ( 22 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 53)
67
Total Points Won
52
W
7-6(5) 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Tibo Colson
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
64% ( 34 of 53)
1st Serve %
62% ( 38 of 61)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 25 of 38)
47% ( 9 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 9 of 23)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
28% ( 15 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 61)
65
Total Points Won
49
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Andrea Picchione
Player
Tibo Colson
67% ( 33 of 49)
1st Serve %
57% ( 39 of 69)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 24 of 39)
69% ( 11 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
27% ( 13 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 32 of 69)
68
Total Points Won
50
L
6-1 7-6(3) H2H
Q1
cross
Tibo Colson
Player
Justin Engel
46% ( 37 of 80)
1st Serve %
56% ( 43 of 77)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 32 of 43)
53% ( 23 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 13 of 34)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
40% ( 32 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 32 of 77)
80
Total Points Won
77
W
6-4 1-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Gabriele Bosio
Player
Tibo Colson
62% ( 23 of 37)
1st Serve %
80% ( 43 of 54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
83% ( 19 of 23)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 27 of 43)
43% ( 6 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
32% ( 12 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 24 of 54)
49
Total Points Won
42
L
7-6(3) ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Tibo Colson
64% ( 32 of 50)
1st Serve %
63% ( 36 of 57)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
75% ( 24 of 32)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 17 of 36)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
32% ( 16 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 32 of 57)
66
Total Points Won
41
L
6-2 6-0 H2H

Decamps Vs Colson Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Decamps are available here and Colson photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions